The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

HOW DID THE NATION’S LEADERS INVESTIGATE HIS CLAIMS?

As Jesus expected, the news of the healing of the leper early in His ministry spread very quickly. The healing of leprosy was a de-facto Messianic claim. Jesus, wishing to bring His claim to the attention of the Sanhedrin sent the healed man to the priests to follow the prescribed procedure. In the administration of the law of the leper, the priest would require answers to three questions.

(1) Had he really been a leper? The priest would need either a testimony, or a priestly record, or better still, both.

(2) Is he now clean? The priests would examine him over a period of seven days to confirm that there was no trace of the disease.

(3) What was the agency of his cleansing? Was it the result of an intervention by someone?

The leper of Luke 5 would have the following answers. To the first question – Yes, he had been a leper, indeed a very severe case, as many would testify. As to the second question, after the seven-day period of examination the priest would confirm his healing. Third and last, the leper would confirm that the Messianic claimant, Jesus of Nazareth did it!

The healing of the leper required the Sanhedrists to act. Investigating a Messianic claim involved three stages:

(i) The stage of observation. This first stage required a delegation from the Sanhedrin to visit and observe the ministry of the Messianic claimant, and then return to Jerusalem and report to the authorities. During this stage, the Sanhedrists were not allowed to cross-examine the claimant; only come to an opinion as to the significance of the Messianic movement. If the movement was significant, they moved to the stage of interrogation. If the movement was considered insignificant then the Sanhedrin would take no further action.

(ii) The stage of interrogation. If the movement was considered significant, the representatives of the Sanhedrin could question the claimant, check his beliefs, raise objections and receive answers to any concerns they had.

(iii) The stage of decision/declaration. At this stage the Sanhedrin were required to declare whether they upheld or dismissed the Messianic claims of the individual, and give reasons for their decision.

Investigating a Messianic Claim – Stage 1: The Stage of Observation

The healing of the leper caused such interest that in addition to the delegation coming from Jerusalem for the stage of observation, “there were Pharisees and teachers of the law sitting by, which had come out of every town of Galilee, Judea, and Jerusalem” (Luke 5:17) These were in the house where He was - observing, taking note. Five friends, driven by need, came to this house, four of them carrying a fifth that lay on a pallet. Trusting that the young Rabbi, who helped the disadvantaged, could help them, they tried to get admittance to the house, but the crowd was too thick.

So climbing to the roof, they made a rough entrance and gently dropped their friend at the feet of the Messiah in silent appeal for His help. Jesus, aware of the delegation from the Sanhedrin and the procedure involved in the stage of observation, took the opportunity presented by the presence of the paralytic to demonstrate His Messianic credentials.

The condition of the paralytic was the result of personal sin, which brought into focus the rabbinical teaching, “the sick is not healed, till all his sins are forgiven him” (Nedar 41a). The 28th chapter of Deuteronomy lists diseases of body and mind that could cling to those that obdurately refuse to honour the Law. From these passages arose the practice of giving up such offenders to a ‘cherem’ or curse, that is, giving them up to Satan. An offender who resisted correction and exhausted all remedy contained in the Law would become “a curse among his people” (Numb.5:27). The Messiah remarked on such a one, “… ought not this woman, being a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has bound for eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the Sabbath?” (Luke 13:16) The paralytic brought to Jesus was one who had been an obdurate sinner whom Satan had bound!

So Jesus first says, “Son, be of good cheer; your sins are forgiven you” (Matt.9:2) Because it was the stage of observation, the delegation could not question the Messiah but they were making mental notes of objections that would later be raised, so it is recorded, “And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, “Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mark 2:6,7)Their theology, of course, was correct, and confirmed by three of the greatest writers of the T’nach. Daniel said, “To the Lord our God belong mercy and forgiveness” (Dan.9:9). Moses quoted God’s self-revelation: “The LORD, the LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering and abounding in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin” (£xod.34.6,7). And David couples the healing of the body with the forgiveness of sins: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, And forget not all His benefits: Who forgives all your iniquities, Who heals all your diseases” (Ps.103.:2,3). God had never delegated the authority to forgive sins to any other, a truth that was surely included in the statement, “my glory I will not give to another” (Isa.42:8). Although the complaint of the scribes was unspoken, yet the Messiah knew and responded to it: “But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said, Why do you think evil in your hearts? For which is easier, to say, Your sins are forgiven you, or to say, Arise and walk? But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins —then He said to the paralytic, Arise, take up your bed, and go to your house. And he (the paralytic) arose and departed to his house” (Matt.9:4-7) Therefore, this miracle was not only an attesting sign of Messiahship but also implied deity. Of course, there was an immediate effect on the crowd, who marvelled and glorified God. Thus, the great prerogative of deity, the ability to forgive sin - was declared, questioned, validated and recognised, at least by some. The Messiah had further supported His Messianic claim and sent the delegation back to Jerusalem to report a significant Messianic movement. The attesting signs were enough to indicate that the movement deserved further investigation. But the issue that would cause the most difficulty for the Jewish leaders was already visible at this early stage – Jesus’ claim to deity! As to His work, He was offering Himself to the nation as the Messiah of God; but as to His person, they would have to appreciate that the Son of God was among them.

On the basis of attesting signs, the Sanhedrin decided to proceed to the stage of interrogation.

Next Time: The Stage of Interrogation

The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

The Seventh Significant Miracle in John – Raising a Dead Man

The seventh sign/miracle is the raising of Lazarus (John 11.1 ff), whose name means, ‘whom God helps’. When Jesus received news that His friend was at the point of death, He not only delayed until Lazarus was dead, but also waited until he had been buried and entombed for four days. When Jesus finally arrived, He voiced the reason for His delay: “that the Son of God might be glorified through it” and, “that you might believe”. There was a great purpose to His actions. While the Messiah could have returned to Bethany earlier and healed Lazarus prior to his decease, or raised him from the dead on the first or second day, His intention was to demonstrate to the leaders of the Jewish nation, that He was able to raise Lazarus, not just from the grave but from Hades. Because of the framework of Jewish belief at that time, they believed that the soul did not descend into Hades until after three days. Jesus needed to wait until the fourth day to demonstrate fully that His power reached to Hades. This sign would be used to demonstrate to the nation, for the last time, the Messianic credentials of Jesus of Nazareth. Furthermore, it was of such a calibre that it would also support His claim to deity, as He said: “This sickness is … for the glory of God, so that the Son of God may be glorified by it.” (John 11:4)

It is this miracle that demonstrated, illustrated, and elucidated, John’s inspired assessment of Jesus: “in Him was life” (John 1:4); and, “he who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life.” (1 John 5:12) Taking a phrase or two from the incident when Jesus forgave the sins of a paralytic before healing him, the Messiah could have asked here: ‘Whether it is easier, to say, I am the resurrection and the life; or to say, Lazarus come forth? But that you may know that the Son of man is the resurrection and the life, (He said to the deceased,) I say unto you, Lazarus come forth!’ Then he that was dead exited the tomb while still bound hand and foot with grave clothes.

We will more fully examine the raising of Lazarus later under the heading of ‘the sign of the prophet Jonah’ (chapter ten).

The Eighth Significant Miracle in John – The Miraculous Catch of Fish

The last sign recorded in John’s gospel is that which took place at the Sea of Galilee after the resurrection of the Messiah. (John 21:1 ff) The disciples should have gathered in the mountain region of Galilee, (Matt.28:16) but Peter had initiated a return to their old occupation, “I am going fishing.” The Greek word used for ‘I go’ is ‘upagw’, The word is made up of two elements. The first is ‘upw’ which can denote secrecy. The second is ‘agw’ which means ‘I go’. Together it is used to denote the final departure of one who ceases to be another’s companion or attendant. Wuest’s expanded N.T. translation reads, ‘Simon Peter says to them, I am going off, breaking my former connections, to my former fishing business.’ Here is Peter’s formal announcement that he was abandoning his preaching mission and going back to his former occupation. The word translated ‘fishing’ is a present infinitive meaning the action is durative, progressive and constant. It refers to the fishing as an occupation. Here then is a crisis. Peter, perhaps still not over his failure when he denied the Messiah, is returning to his old life, and leading the others to join him.

Jesus the Messiah meets the crisis with a double miracle, the first part of which was negative. This team of fisherman worked all night yet their nets were empty. Firstly, the Messiah demonstrated that fishing was not their future. Then, in the morning he stood on the shore incognito and instructed them to cast their nets again, this time on the other side of the boat. They caught 153 fish. This exceptional, miraculous draught of fish bore a remarkable similarity to that which they had experienced three years earlier. Accordingly, they understood the stranger to be the Messiah. On bringing the catch to shore, they were invited to a breakfast of bread and fish that had already been prepared. Thus, on obeying their Lord, their needs were met abundantly.

Some of the detail of the narrative is very illuminating. To emphasise the negative aspect of the miracle, Jesus enquired, “children, have you any food?”(KJV) In the NASB it is, “children, you do not have any fish, do you?” with the extra note, “literally, something eaten with bread”. The disciples answered, “No.” The enquiry, “Children, have you any food?” was very usual among the Rabbis of that day, and could mean, ‘have you sufficient for one meal?’ (in this context, breakfast), or, ‘I have bread – have you something to go with it?’ (Bread is the other symbol of the Melchizadekian blessing) (Gen.14:18). The disciples who had returned to their old occupation did not have enough for one meal. On the other hand, the Messiah had a meal of bread with fish already cooking. And in consequence of the second, positive aspect of the miracle, Jesus invited them to bring the recently caught fish. (John 21:10) 

John now isolates the name of Peter for his next statement: “Simon Peter went up and drew the net to land, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three; and although there were so many, the net was not torn.” (John 21:11) This is in contrast with what happened at the almost identical miracle when Peter received his call to service (Luke 5:1-11). Then the net broke. But that was when Peter was a fisherman. Since then the Messiah had changed Peter’s career: “… from now on you will be catching men” (Luke 5:10). While Peter follows his commission as a fisher of men, the net of the gospel will not break.

In this, the last sign in John’s gospel, the principle of table fellowship is re-emphasised. They ate with the Lord. In the first sign in John’s gospel, table fellowship was prominent. There, He provided wine. Here at the lakeside He provided bread. Significantly, table fellowship is placed at the heart of the Church’s activities, where bread and wine symbolically represent the body and blood of Christ. (Matt.26.26-28; Mark 14.22-24; Lk.22.19,20) ‘The cup of the blessing that we bless—is it not the fellowship of the blood of the Christ? the bread that we break—is it not the fellowship of the body of the Christ?’ (1 Cor.10.16 (Young’s literal translation))

The Significance of the Signs in John’s Gospel

The signs for the nation before His rejection included turning the water into wine, healing the ruler’s son who was at the point of death, the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda, and feeding a multitude of people. These indicate that when Messiah came to them, the nation was a nation in captivity, without freedom and under a hard rule, not only that of Rome, but also that of the Sanhedrin.

(i) They were without blessing and without joy, as in the first sign, they had no wine.

(ii) Nationally, they were on the point of death, as in the second sign.

(iii) The third sign reflects their impotence as a nation, an impotence that was the result of sin, especially that of their leaders.

(iv) In consequence, the people were like sheep without a shepherd, which is the context of the fourth sign.

If they had trusted their Messiah,

(i) they would have had joy “up to the brim”, as at the wedding in Cana (John’s first sign).

(ii) they would have been restored from the point of death as with the nobleman’s son (John’s second sign)

(iii) given a new start with a new purpose, as with the paralytic at the pool of Siloam (John’s third sign), and

(iv) would have been fed (physically, intellectually and spiritually) by Jesus the Good Shepherd, as was the great crowd (John’s fourth sign).

However, the majority of the nation were categorised as “wicked”, “evil” and “adulterous”. They believed neither the Scriptures nor their Messiah. They followed the lead of the Sanhedrin and rejected the Messianic claims of Jesus. Jesus would give them one last national sign, the sign of the prophet Jonah. The first element of sign of the prophet Jonah was the raising of Lazarus (the seventh significant miracle in John). This Messianic attesting miracle was not a call to the nation to change their attitude to Him, but a practical exercise to demonstrate that nothing can melt the hard hearts of those who do not believe the Scriptures, not even someone rising from Hades. The obdurate unbelief of the Jews of Jerusalem, and the Sanhedrin in particular, was stripped bare for all to recognise.

The disciples, on the other hand, were a believing remnant, and saw His glory:

(i) At a wedding, in a context of love, when He brought joy by providing wine for the blessing of bride, groom and guests. (sign 1)

a. It would be a joy, that for the disciples, would be complete and enduring: “These things I have spoken to you so that My joy may be in you, and that your joy may be made full”. (John 15:11)

b. It would be a joy in a context of love: “Just as the Father has loved Me, I have also loved you; abide in My love”. (John 15:9)

(ii) On the sea, when He walked on water and calmed the storm, signifying there was no tempest that would be able to engulf them (sign 5)

a. His peace is effective in all situations; “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Do not let your heart be troubled, nor let it be fearful.” (John 14:27)

(iii) At the pool of Siloam, where He opened the eyes of a man born blind (sign 6) demonstrating that He is the Light of the world

a. While they followed Him they would always walk in His light: “I have come as Light into the world, so that everyone who believes in Me will not remain in darkness.” (John 12:46)

(iv) At a graveside, where He raised the dead (sign 7)

a. He provides resurrection life: “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His coming” (1 Cor.15:22,23)

(v) At the lakeside, where they dined on bread and fish (sign 8),

a. In the context of the resurrection, they enjoyed fellowship: “What we have seen and heard we proclaim to you also, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ.” (1 John 1:3)

For those who received Him as Messiah, He promised eternal joy, love, peace, light, life and fellowship.

Next Time: HOW DID THE NATION’S LEADERS INVESTIGATE HIS CLAIMS?

The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

The Sixth of the Significant Miracles in John – Healing the Man Born Blind

The context for this miracle was the Feast of Tabernacles in which there were two main ceremonies, 'the pouring out of the waters' and 'the kindling of the lamps'.

The Ceremony of the Pouring Out of the Waters

The Jewish nation considered that God had placed high honour upon the water of the fountain of Siloam, and in consequence, on the pools of Bethesda and Siloam, which were fed from that fountain. They applied the words of the prophet to the waters, “Therefore with joy you will draw water from the wells of salvation … for great is the Holy One of Israel in your midst” (Isa. 12:3,6). Furthermore, they asserted, “From thence they drew the Holy Ghost” (Succah, Palestinian Talmud). This, of course, is a reference to the ceremony of the pouring out of the waters at the feast of Tabernacles. On the feast days, a priest carrying a golden pitcher would collect 6 or 7 pints of water from the pool of Siloam and lead a procession back to the Temple. On the way, they would sing the Psalms of Ascent arriving at the court of priests at the close of the morning service. A threefold blast on the trumpets would welcome the bearer of the golden pitcher as he entered through the water gate, where another priest bearing a pitcher of wine for the drink offering joined him. The two priests ascended the rise of the altar one going left and the other right, to pour out the libations, through funnels, to the foot of the altar. Immediately after, they sang the great ‘Hallel’ with responses from the people. They ended by singing:

“Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will go through them, and I will praise the LORD. This is the gate of the LORD, through which the righteous shall enter. I will praise You, for You have answered me, And have become my salvation. The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief cornerstone. This was the LORD’s doing; It is marvelous in our eyes. This is the day the LORD has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Save now, I pray, O LORD; O LORD, I pray, send now prosperity. Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD! We have blessed you from the house of the LORD. God is the LORD, And He has given us light; Bind the sacrifice with cords to the horns of the altar. You are my God, and I will praise You; You are my God, I will exalt You. Oh, give thanks to the LORD, for He is good! For His mercy endures forever.” (Ps. 118:20-29)

Jesus, attending the ceremony at the festival, would have been intensely aware of the significance of these verses. After the ceremony of the pouring out of those waters, He proclaimed in a loud clear voice, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water”. John added the explanation, “This He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.” (John 7:37-39) Here Jesus claimed to be the promised ‘Nabhi’, the prophet, the ‘weller-forth’, the expected One. Those that exercised faith in Him would be like the pool of Siloam, reservoirs of living water out of which are drawn water libations for YHWH. God would quench their thirst and make them a blessing to others. The apostles were the best illustration of the fulfilment of this promise, since their post-Pentecost ministry was attended by conversions and miracles.

This then, is the context of the action of the Messiah in the healing of the man with congenital blindness. The stigma that had been heaped upon the man by the Pharisaic system, (where sin is marked, identified and catalogued), was washed away by the Spirit of God. Jesus drew a straight line from the symbolism of the ceremony of the pouring out of the waters to the healing of the man and His office as Messiah.

The Ceremony of the Kindling of the Lamps

Furthermore, He used the other ceremony of the feast, the lighting of the menorahs, to illustrate again His office and ministry. There were four menorahs, one in each corner of the court of prayer. They were 86 foot high, and youths of priestly descent would climb ladders to fill each of them with oil (more than 30 gallons each). Worn out garments of the priests had been reformed to make the wicks. At night, the menorahs were lit and the court of prayer was illuminated so brightly that its light was seen throughout Jerusalem.

This light symbolised the Shekinah that once filled the Temple, and was a major motif of the festival because:

(i) the descent of the Shekinah at the dedication of the Solomon’s Temple took place at this feast, (1 Kings 8:2 ff; 2 Chron.7).

(ii) the burning lamps represented the Shekinah that was seen as a pillar of fire on their wilderness journey. The wilderness journey when the Shekinah guided them from Egypt to Canaan, was the principal motif of the Festival. According to Jewish tradition, the pillar first appeared to lead Israel from Egypt to Canaan on the 15th Tishri, which was the first day of the feast of Tabernacles.

So when Jesus stood in the shadow of a menorah and proclaimed, “I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life”, (John 8:12; cf 3:19; 9:5; 12:46). He not only affirmed He was the Messiah, but also the Shekinah of God now returned to Israel.

The Shekinah that dwelt in the Tabernacle when it pitched.

The Shekinah that led them and protected them when they journeyed.

The Shekinah that fed them with bread from heaven.

The Shekinah that gave them living water to drink.

The Shekinah that healed all their diseases.

The Shekinah that dispelled the darkness, and guided them to the promised land.

The Shekinah that resided over the mercy seat in the Temple.

The truth that Jesus was the Shekinah, the visible representation of God, was re-enforced by another of His declarations at that time: “Before Abraham was I am”. At this statement, “they picked up stones to throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple” (John 8:59). John is repeating and reinforcing the truth, “… the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). John restated in different ways at different points in his gospel, God walked on earth in the person of Jesus.

The brilliant light from the court of women was also intended to represent Messiah, for Isaiah had prophesied of the Coming One: “The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined” (Isa.9:2). As Simeon said when Joseph and Mary brought the Messiah to the Temple for the first time, He was to be “a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of … Israel” (Luke 2:32).

The law required the light of the Sanctuary to be always lit, not that God required light but that it was prophetic of the time when God would kindle for them ‘the Great Light’. The Rabbis would speak of the light with which God wrapped Himself as with a garment, which was reserved under the throne of God for the Messiah, in whose days it would shine forth once more. In a Midrash on Lamentations 1.16, the Messiah is designated as the ‘Enlightener’, the words of Daniel 2.22 “and light dwells with Him” being applied to Him.

Jesus made a point of finding the newly sighted man later, so that He could give him even more light, that is spiritual sight. When Jesus met him again, He asked: “Do you believe in the Son of God?” (John 9:35 ff) This outcast of Jewish society who was unfamiliar with the Messianic ministry of Jesus responded: “Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on Him?” When Jesus replied, “You have both seen Him and it is He who is talking with you,” he reacted: “Lord, I believe. And he worshipped Him”. This momentous miracle not only supported His Messianic credentials, and illuminated His latest self-revelatory ‘I AM’ statement, that is: “I AM the light of the world” (John 9:5), but also demonstrated the truth of His claim to be the Son of God (John 9:1). It was a work of God on several levels (John 9:3).

The timing of the miracle is significant. It took place after the Sanhedrin had declared that they had rejected the Messianic claim of Jesus. So He did not offer it as an attesting sign, nor could the Sanhedrists accept it as such. Nevertheless, Jesus, by performing this and other similar miracles was establishing His claim more and more, compelling His opponents to respond. In the time period between the two encounters with the Messiah, the beggar was interviewed by the Pharisees. They consistently sought to undermine the value of any Messianic miracle and the reputation of the One who performed it. They said, “we know that this man is a sinner” (John9:24), now placing on the Messiah the same stigma that had been placed on the blind beggar; a stigma that had been removed by the miraculous intervention of Jesus. The beggar, newly sighted, could see the inconsistency in their argument. “Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, He could do nothing” (John 9:32,33). The Pharisees countered by re-stigmatizing the healed man, “You were completely born in sins, and are you teaching us?” (John 9:34)

These events finished with a summary by Jesus, “For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind” (John 9:39). He again branded the Pharisees as “blind leaders of the blind”.

Next time: The Seventh Significant Miracle in John – Raising a Dead Man

The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

The Fifth of the Significant Miracles in John – Walking on the Sea

The fifth significant miracle was that which took place on the Sea of Galilee at night (John 6:16-21). If the storm on the lake, as some of the old commentators suggest, was Satanic in origin, then here is another example of a challenge to Messiah. Certainly, the sea in Scripture is connected typically with the abyss, the temporary place of confinement of demons. For example, the demons in Legion, the Gadarene, referred to it in their appeal to Messiah, “… they begged Him that He would not command them to go out into the abyss”  (Luke 8:31 (NASB)).Yet in that incident, although we have no indication of the ultimate intention of Jesus, they ended up in a watery prison. David, in considerable trouble, used the image of sinking into deep waters to describe his experience, “Save me, O God; for the waters are come in unto my soul. I sink in deep mire, where there is no standing: I am come into deep waters, where the floods overflow me … Let not the waterflood overflow me, neither let the deep swallow me up, and let not the pit shut her mouth upon me” (Ps.69:1,2,15 KJV). On the restless sea, there is no place to stand,–and because of our sins we will be engulfed. “The devil will drag you under”, is the line from an old song. Jesus was different. The sinless, spotless, Son of God walked on water. Moreover, He would not allow Satan to destroy His disciples: “Simon, Simon, listen! Satan has demanded to sift all of you like wheat, but I have prayed for you” (Luke 22:31). Moreover, when He entered the boat it was immediately at its destination! Satan could neither divert the Messiah by offering Him the kingdom again, nor remove those disciples that He had taken under His care; “… of those You gave me I have lost none” (John 18:9). The exception listed in Scripture is Judas, the son of perdition, who at that time was demon-possessed, and later became Satan-possessed.

In the miracle on the Sea of Galilee, the divine Son of God demonstrated again that He would thwart every attempt by Satan to drag Him down. The Devil, by threatening the lives of the disciples, was making a two-pronged attack. First he tried to destroy the remnant that believed in Jesus as Messiah; and then, by the act of putting the lives of the disciples in jeopardy, he intended to lure Jesus on to the element most under his control, and most likely to accomplish his diabolical aim of bringing the Messiah down. Perhaps Satan, familiar with David’s prophetic prayer, hoped to bring Jesus to the need to pray it Himself: “Save me, O God, for the waters have threatened my life. I have sunk in deep mire, and there is no foothold; I have come into deep waters, and a flood overflows me” (Ps.69:1,2).

Not only did Jesus walk on water, but He also stilled the storm, saved Peter from sinking beneath the waves, and brought the craft safe home. The multitude fed, Peter saved, the devil defeated, no wonder they, “worshipped Him, saying, You are certainly God’s Son” (Matt.14:33).

Nevertheless, it cannot be overlooked that the Messiah in becoming a sin offering on Calvary, fully experienced all that David described: “I sink in deep mire, where there is no standing: I am come into deep waters, where the floods overflow me” .

The Sixth of the Significant Miracles in John – Healing the Man Born Blind

This sixth significant miracle (John 9:1-40) takes place on the Sabbath at the end of the feast of Tabernacles. The Messiah and His disciples had entered the Temple Mount when they saw a man with congenital blindness. They were aware of the theology of the Rabbis who taught that being born blind was the judgement of God on the individual. They claimed that this man’s condition was the result of personal sin, either his own or his parents. The disciples asked: “Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?” (John 9:1) The sin of the parents as the source of the judgement was based on verses from the Pentateuch, for example: “The Lord God … who keeps loving-kindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, visiting the iniquity of fathers on the children and on the grandchildren to the third and fourth generations,”  (Exod.34:7) and: “The LORD is slow to anger and abundant in loving-kindness, forgiving iniquity and transgression; but He will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generations.” (Numb.14:18)

The Pharisees also taught that an individual had a good inclination and an evil inclination, and that if the evil inclination had predominance in the womb, then it would be possible for the child to be born disadvantaged because of the judgement of God. The Rabbis further taught that since the infirmity was a judgement from God, only Messiah would be able to cure it. Jesus responded to the disciples’ question with the assertion that the man’s blindness was not the result of a judgement on personal sin. God did not inflict blindness on this individual, but rather the opposite, He would be healed, to the glory of God.

For the blind man, the Messiah made a clay poultice out of dust and spit, and applied it to his eyes. He then instructed him to go to the pool of Siloam and wash away the mudpack. When he washed, he was able to see clearly. The two ingredients of the poultice were dust and spittle. Biblically, dust represents the Adamic man, and to spit upon a man is to humiliate him, to count him worthless, to consider him unworthy of the courtesies of life. This was the condition of the blind beggar. Pharisaism counted him inconsequential. On the other hand, the means of his cure, the water from the pool of Siloam symbolically represented the Spirit of God. This symbolism was at the heart of the ceremonies that took place during the week of the festival.

We will examine the significance of the two main ceremonies of the Feast of Tabernacles (the context for this miracle) next time.  

The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

The Fourth of the Significant Miracles in John – Feeding a Large Crowd

The fourth of the miracles that John records is the feeding of the great crowd. It is near the feast of the Passover when Jesus decided to supply the obvious need of many thousands of people by multiplying a few loaves and a few fish. He also knew that His actions would bring the nation closer to a decision regarding His offer of the Messianic Kingdom.

The crowd, in the Messiah’s eyes, were like a flock of sheep without a shepherd, and He viewed them with compassion. They had been following the old shepherds, the Sanhedrists, whom Jesus later described as wolves. Here, the Messiah presented Himself as their shepherd, in the tradition of Moses and David, former shepherds of the nation. At that time, they were between two opinions. Should they follow the old shepherds, whom Jesus described as thieves and robbers, or should they follow the new shepherd of Israel.

The Messiah’s intention was twofold, the first part of which concerned His identity. He offered Himself as Messiah, the expected prophet, who like Moses would feed Israel in a wilderness; and as the son of David, the shepherd of Israel who would “feed Jacob his people, and Israel his inheritance” (Ps.78.70-72).

The second element of His purpose was to provide training for His disciples who, in the course of time, would be shepherds themselves. The ‘shepherd in training’ had first to learn that it is not the job of the sheep to find food for themselves, but the task of the shepherd to provide it for them. “You give them something to eat” (Matt.14:16), is the principle. Here, away from any centres of population, there are no resources, save five loaves and two fish. But they did have the Messiah’s benediction, which was enough to multiply their small repast into a giant picnic. One day, Peter and his fellow apostles will be responsible for feeding the flock. At the post-resurrection miracle, where the Lord provided bread and fish for the disciples, the Messiah commissioned Peter: “feed my lambs”; “tend my sheep”; “feed my sheep”. The responsibility of Peter and his fellow apostles would involve them distributing what Jesus Himself provided.

The initial response to the miracle once more demonstrated John’s consistent argument, that Jesus provided enough evidence to prove He was truly their Messiah. The people said: “This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world” (John 6:14). They were ready there and then to take Him and make Him king, by force if necessary; but the Messiah with His special insight into the heart of man departed to be by Himself in the mountains.

The identity of the prophet from Nazareth continued to be the centre of debate between the people and Jesus the following day. The doctrine of the teachers of Israel at that time was a doctrine of works, so they questioned the Lord: “What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?” (John 6:28 ff). He directed them to the real issue: “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent”. Since they knew it was an appeal for them to accept His credentials as Messiah, true to their character, they asked for yet another miracle. They asked: “What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do?” (John  6:30) But the crowd had forgotten that the fathers of the wilderness generation had grumbled against God and God’s Deliverer, Moses, for providing such food. The Messiah, however, had not: “Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead”. There is a double level of meaning here. YHWH fed that generation of the nation miraculously, but because of their rebellion, He punished them. They were exposed to a plague of serpents. Numbers 21 has the record of the event: “The people spoke against God and against Moses: Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and our soul loathes this worthless bread. So the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and many of the people of Israel died.” (Num.21:5,6) The Biblical account records the physical death of the rebels, and the teaching of the Scribes at that time suggested, nay asserted, that their rebellion lost them their spiritual privileges as children of Abraham. The Mishnah states, 'The generation of the wilderness has no portion in the world to come and will not stand in judgment, for it is written, “In this wilderness they shall be consumed and there they shall die”, (Num.14:35) the words of R. Aqiba'. The thrust of the argument of Jesus is that the eternal destiny of His generation is in the balance. He is offering Himself as the ‘Bread of Life’, and those that feed on Him will live forever! He said, “Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world… I am the bread of life” (John 6:32-35).

In this way, the Messiah incorporated into His teaching an implicit warning to the nation, not to repeat the sin of the generation that came out of Egypt and reject the Bread of Life now offered, and the Father who sent it from heaven. If Israel’s leaders reject their Messiah, then judgement will fall on this generation as it did on the wilderness generation. On the other hand, those individuals that receive Jesus as Messiah will be able to feed on Him and enjoy every aspect of abundant life. This heavenly bread will feed both mind and spirit, whereas the manna fed only the body. The manna fed the physical, not spiritual and lasted two days at most. The life granted to those that receive Him as Messiah, would be spiritual rather than physical, eternal rather than temporal and heavenly rather than earthly. This means they were guaranteed satisfaction and resurrection.

They rejected His offer, “… because He said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.” “… they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?” (John 6:41,42)Moreover, those that rejected Him were not just those who had been undecided. They also included those who had been His followers. This teaching even offended many of His disciples, and the Lord speaks of unbelief and betrayal among them. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray Him. From that time many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him, which disloyalty was also amongst the apostles, in the person of Judas: “Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” (John 6:70) Jesus challenged them all, “Do you also want to go away?” Peter, speaking for the eleven, responded: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. Also we have come to believe and know that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (John 6:68,69) This small band of men, therefore, represent the faithful remnant.

The feeding of the multitude showed Jesus as the incarnate God, who came from heaven. He alone was able to say, “He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. … For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day” (John 6:35-39)

This event encapsulated the problem He faced. In this miracle, the crowd, impressed by the creative power of Jesus, wanted to make Him king, but on their own terms. He did not fulfil their hopes in the way they expected. He ‘departed’ from them, physically illustrating the movement of the Messiah away from unbelieving Israel.

More next time.

The Messiah and His Miracles (Continued)

The Third of the Significant Miracles in John – Healing a Disabled Man

The third sign is the healing of a severely disabled man. It was in Jerusalem, the nation’s capital, and at the pool of Bethesda, near the sheep gate. It was at the time of an un-named feast. Whereas in the previous miracle those in need approached the Messiah, here with evident intent, He took the initiative. Out of the crowd at the poolside, He selected a physical wreck of a man, and asked him if he wished to be healed. The Bible tells us that the waters of Bethesda had healing virtue at certain seasons. The “certain seasons” (John 5:4) were probably feast times. So among the “multitude of those who were sick, blind, lame, and paralysed” (John 5:3) was this paralytic. He responded to the stranger’s invitation by saying that the only resource, the healing waters, were out of his reach during the short time they were blessed. Jesus permitted no further objections and healed him with the words, “take up your bed and walk” (John 5:8).

Not knowing the identity of his benefactor, the now healthy Israelite climbed the Temple mount for the first time in nearly four decades, there to give thanks and praise to God for His beneficence. The merciful Messiah had given yet another person a new start, both physically and spiritually. Later that day, the One who not only had the power to loose from sin, but also to bind, found the man still in the Temple, and warned him, “Sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon you” (John 5:14). 

This sign, performed as it was in the nation’s capital, has somewhat of a national application. The Sanhedrin had not yet published their decision, so Jesus offers, in Jerusalem, a further fingerpost sign. The cure at the poolside demonstrated that the ‘miqweh’, ‘the immersion pool’, ‘the fountain of living waters’, ‘the Hope of Israel’ Himself, was present to heal (cf. Jer.17:13,14). If they rejected Him they would be guilty of the same two sins as the generation that was taken into captivity: “they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water” (Jer.2:13).

The long-term invalid was a man whose condition was the result of obdurate sin. He had been chronically ill and disadvantaged for 38 years. This period of time reminds us of the generation which wandered in the wilderness for a further 38 years after God had found them guilty of ‘stiff-necked’ sin. If this sign is for the nation, then it must be a warning to those rebel leaders of the current generation. The warning to the newly invigorated man contained the pregnant phrase, “lest a worse thing come upon you”. Later, when Jesus was accused of being demon-possessed and formally rejected by the Sanhedrin, he told the leadership that a worse thing would come upon them. Their condition would deteriorate by a factor of seven because of their rejection of His Messianic claim.

The emphasis here is on the matter of sin. The principles are: “the invalid is not healed until his sins are forgiven” (Ned.41.a; cf. Jas.5:15), and: “who can forgive sins, but God alone?” (Mark 2:7; Luke 5:21).  At the pool of Bethesda, served by the fountain of Siloam, Jesus brings into focus the prophecy of Zechariah: “there shall be a fountain (wellspring) opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness” (Zech.13:1).

This healing took place on the Sabbath, and the reaction of those that had political power was to persecute Jesus and conspire to kill Him. Their Messiah indicated that He had had no alternative but to follow His mission, obey His Father, and heal the invalid: “My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working” (John 5:17). The Sanhedrists were further incensed: “for this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God” (John 5:18).